Ingrida Baranauskienė, Liudmyla Serdiuk, Ivan Danyliuk, Anton Kurapov


The article describes the psychological study aimed at determining of the factors supporting disabled adolescents’ psychological well-being. Learning in the inclusive educational environment has a high developmental potential for social adaptation, revealing of the internal resources for self-realization and psychological well-being of adolescents with disabilities. The factors supporting disabled adolescents’ psychological well-being are revealed and the prognostic model of its development is proposed. The most important factors supporting disabled adolescents’ psychological well-being are: an expected attitude from others to them, their self-interest, self-esteem, meanings in life and goals understood by them, self-confidence, and belief in their own abilities. The predictors having the greatest impact on psychological well-being and presented in the developed predictive model are: commitment, acceptance of aggression, self-esteem, and the expected attitude of others.

Straipsnyje pristatomas psichologinis tyrimas, kurio tikslas – nustatyti veiksnius, palaikančius paauglių, turinčių negalę, psichologinę gerovę. Mokymasis inkliuzinėje ugdymo aplinkoje turi didelį socialinės adaptacijos vystymo potencialą, atskleidžiant vidinius paauglių, turinčių negalę, savirealizacijos ir psichologinės gerovės resursus. Empiriniame tyrime dalyvavo 121 mokinys iš Kijevo (Ukraina) inkliuzinių mokyklų: 54 vaikinai ir 67 merginos, turintys negalę. Atskleisti veiksniai, palaikantys neįgalių paauglių psichologinę gerovę, ir pasiūlytas prognostinis jos raidos modelis. Svarbiausi paauglių, turinčių negalę, psichologinę gerovę palaikantys veiksniai yra šie: laukiamas aplinkinių požiūris į juos, jų domėjimasis savimi, savigarba, gyvenimo prasmė ir jų suprantami tikslai, pasitikėjimas savimi ir tikėjimas savo sugebėjimais. Požymiai, darantys didžiausią įtaką psichologinei gerovei ir pateikiami sukurtame prognozavimo modelyje, yra: įsipareigojimas, agresijos priėmimas, savigarba ir laukiamas požiūris iš aplinkinių


psychological well-being, life satisfaction, personal growth, adolescents with disabilities, integration, inclusion / psichologinė gerovė; pasitenkinimas gyvenimu; asmeninis augimas; paaugliai, turintys negalę; integracija; inkliuzija


Adolescent Mental Health. (2018). World Health Organization. Retrieved 17 November 2019, from

Ališauskienė, S., & Milteniene, L. (2019). Inkliuzinis ar įtraukusis ugdymas: socialinių konstruktų interpretacijos švietimo kaitos kontekste. Specialusis Ugdymas/Special Education, 1(38), 11-32.

Antinienėa D., Lekavičienėb R. (2017). Psychological and physical well-being of Lithuanian youth: Relation to emotional intelligence. Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania. Received 22 September 2015, received in revised form 21 January 2017. Accepted 18 May 2017.

Bogart, K. R., Rottenstein, A., Lund, E. M., & Bouchard, L. (2017). Who self-identifies as disabled? An examination of impairment and contextual predictors. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62(4), 553.

Bowling, A., Banister, D., Sutton, S., Evans, O., & Winsdor, J. (2002). A multidimensional model of the quality of life in older age. Aging & Mental Health, 6(4), 355-371.

Crosby, S. D., Algood, C. L., Sayles, B., & Cubbage, J. (2017). An Ecological Examination of Factors That Impact Well-being Among Developmentally Disabled Youth in the Juvenile Justice System. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 68(2), 5-18.

Di Giulio, P., Philipov, D., & Jaschinski, I. (2014). Families with disabled children in different European countries. Families And Societies. Working Paper Series, 23 (2014).

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2009). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. In The science of well-being (pp. 103-118). Springer, Dordrecht.

Dixon, J. (2008). Young people leaving care: health, well-being and outcomes. Child & Family Social Work, 13(2), 207-217.

Dolan, P. & Metcalfe, R. (2011) Measuring subjective wellbeing for public policy: recommendations on measures. Centre for Economic Performance special papers (CEPSP23). Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Jones, N., Presler-Marshall, E., & Stavropoulou, M. (2018). Adolescents with disabilities: enhancing resilience and delivering inclusive development. ODI GAGE Report. London: ODI.

Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 107(38), 16489-16493.

Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., Glasser, D. B., Kang, J. H., Wang, T., Levinson, B., Moreira, E., Nicolosi, A., & Gingell, C. (2006). A cross-national study of subjective sexual well-being among older women and men: Findings from the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Archives of sexual behavior, 35(2), 143-159.

Leontev, D., & Rasskazova, E. (2006). Тест жизнестойкости [Test of psychological hardiness]. Moscow: Smysl.

Maddi, S.R. (2013). Hardiness. Turning stressful circumstances into resilient growth. Springer Science & Business Media.

Maxey, M., & Beckert, T. E. (2017). Adolescents with disabilities. Adolescent Research Review, 2(2), 59-75.

Montie J., Abery B. (2011) Impact Newsletter: Social and Emotional Well-Being of Children and Youth with Disabilities: A Brief Overview. In Palmer, S., Heyne, L., Montie, J., Abery, B., & Gaylord, V. (Eds.). (Spring/Summer 2011). Impact: Feature Issue on Supporting the Social Well-Being of Children and Youth with Disabilities, 24(1). [Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration]. Retrieved 17 November 2019, from

Mpofu, J., Sefotho, M. M., & Maree, J. G. (2017). Psychological well-being of adolescents with physical disabilities in Zimbabwean inclusive community settings: An exploratory study. African Journal of Disability (Online), 6, 1-7.

Prunas, A., Di Pierro, R., Huemer, J., & Tagini, A. (2019). Defense mechanisms, remembered parental caregiving, and adult attachment style. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 36(1), 64.

Rigby, B.T., & Huebner, E.T. (2005). Do causual attributions mediate the relationship between personality characteristics and life satisfaction in adolescence? Psychology in the Schools, 42, 91-99.

Ryff, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.

Serdiuk, L., Danyliuk, I., & Chaika, G. (2018). Personal autonomy as a key factor of human self-determination. Social Welfare. Interdisciplinary Approach, 8(1), 85-93. DOI: 10.21277/sw.v1i8.357.

Shilling, V., Bailey, S., Logan, S., & Morris, C. (2015). Peer support for parents of disabled children part 2: how organizational and process factors influenced shared experience in a one‐to‐one service, a qualitative study. Child: care, health and development, 41(4), 537-546.

Stolin, V., & Pantileev, S. (1988). Опросник самоотношения [Self-Attitude Questionnaire]. Практикум по психодиагностике: психодиагностические материалы [Practical book on psychodiagnostics: psychodiagnostic materials], Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow University.

Zaborskis, A., Zemaitiene, N., Grabauskas, V. J., Puras, D., & Povilaitis, R. (2007). Lithuania: youth mental health–from research to policies, practice and partnerships. In Social cohesion for mental well-being among adolescents. WHO/HBSC Forum (pp. 140-52).



  • There are currently no refbacks.